Asana vs Namviek
Namviek is the narrower, self-hosted choice for small teams that need task management, common project views, dashboards, and basic reporting while retaining source and infrastructure control. Asana is the better fit for organizations that need broader work-management coverage such as dependencies, portfolios, intake forms, automation, workload planning, AI workflows, or extensive integrations. Choose Namviek when a “
Decision guide
The practical reasons to choose either option, based on documented capabilities.
Choose Namviek if
- Small development teams operating Namviek on their own infrastructure
- Teams using board, list, calendar, and goal-oriented task views
- Teams needing CSV/XLSX import and export for task data portability
Stay with Asana if
- Projects require documented dependency, milestone, timeline, or Gantt planning
- Organizations rely on portfolios, company-level goals, workload, or capacity planning
- Workflows need intake forms, rules-based automation, approvals, or proofing processes AI-assisted coordination or a broad app-integration catalog is required
Deployment and operations
Namviek is GPL-3.0-licensed and self-hostable. The documented stack includes Next.js, Node.js, MongoDB, and Redis. Docker setup is provided, including local Redis, MongoDB, and Minio services; manual installation documentation and Vercel and Render deployment options are also linked. Operators are responsible for hosting and maintenance. No Kubernetes deployment is documented.
Migration considerations
Namviek documents importing and exporting data in .xlsx and .csv formats. The supplied material does not establish a direct Asana importer, field mapping, attachment migration, or preservation of dependencies and other Asana-specific structures, so migration may require an intermediate spreadsheet export and manual validation.
Feature fit
What Namviek covers
- Assigned task tracking
- Board and list views
- Calendar-based scheduling
- Goal-oriented views
- Filtered custom views
- Dashboards and project reporting
What’s different or missing
- No documented timeline or Gantt view
- No documented task dependencies or milestones
- No documented portfolio management
- No documented intake forms or workflow rules
- No documented workload or capacity planning
- No documented AI-assisted workflows
- No documented broad integration catalog
Project snapshot
- GitHub stars
- 2,547
- Contributors
- 7
- Language
- TypeScript
- Last commit
- Jun 20, 2025
- Latest release
- Not available
Categories: Workflow Automation, Customer Relationship Management, Project Management, Task Management, Digital Whiteboards, Document Collaboration
Sources and editorial review12 linked sources
Public documentation supports this comparison. Automation assists collection and classification; editorial standards and corrections remain the responsibility of Kris.
The open-source project management tool for tiny teams
repository description · github.comNamviek is designed for development teams operating on limited budgets, providing essential project management features without the high costs.
readme · github.comNamviek, being a self-hosted solution, only requires a fixed hosting cost of $10-15 per month
readme · github.com
readme · github.com$ yarn compose-build $ yarn compose-up
readme · github.comVercel ... Render ... One-Click Deploy Options
readme · github.comThe open-source project management tool for tiny teams
verdict · github.comVisualize your workflow. Move tasks between stages for clear progress tracking.
shared feature · namviek.comNamviek's goal and calendar views help you track tasks, manage deadlines, and stay organized.
shared feature · namviek.com$ cp .env.example .env.local $ yarn compose-build $ yarn compose-up
deployment · github.comIt helps run all required services (Redis, MongoDB, Minio) locally.
deployment · github.comEasily import/export data using .xlsx or .csv file formats.
migration · namviek.com
