Replace.so logoReplace.so
Trello alternatives
TvsT

Trello vs Ticky

Ticky is a plausible migration target for teams that primarily need self-hosted Kanban boards and are willing to operate the application themselves. It documents boards, cards, deadlines, subtasks, templates, time tracking, and user management, but not Trello’s broader views, capture tools, calendar planning, automation, or integration ecosystem. Choose Ticky for an MIT-licensed, offline-capable deployment and Trello

Trello versus Ticky comparison

Decision guide

The practical reasons to choose either option, based on documented capabilities.

Choose Ticky if

  • Teams seeking self-hosted Kanban boards under an MIT license
  • Organizations able to maintain a Docker-based application and MySQL database
  • Personal or team workflows needing cards, subtasks, deadlines, reminders, comments, attachments, or time tracking without Trello’s broader planning suite

Stay with Trello if

  • You depend on Calendar, Timeline, Table, Dashboard, Map, or workspace-level views
  • You capture tasks from email, Slack, or Microsoft Teams into an inbox
  • You require calendar time-block planning, board automation, Power-Ups, or Trello’s documented integration ecosystem
Deployment and operations

Ticky is self-hostable and MIT-licensed. Its recommended installation uses Docker Compose with separate application and MySQL 8 containers plus persistent volumes; a manual .NET setup is also documented. SMTP is optional, and the application can run fully offline with email functions and the avatar service disabled. Database migrations are applied automatically at startup. No Kubernetes deployment is documented.

Migration considerations

Ticky documents Trello board import, including mapping assigned Trello members to Ticky users. The supplied material does not specify which other board data is preserved, so validate representative exports before committing to migration.

Feature fit

What Ticky covers

  • Kanban boards with movable cards
  • Deadlines and task responsibility support
  • Subtasks comparable to checklist steps
  • Reusable boards through cloning
  • Team access and card collaboration

What’s different or missing

  • No documented alternate project views
  • No documented inbox task capture
  • No documented calendar Planner
  • No documented board automation engine
  • No documented Power-Ups or integration catalog
  • No documented custom fields

Project snapshot

GitHub stars
289
Contributors
2
Language
HTML
Last commit
Jul 16, 2026
Latest release
Jan 2, 2026

Categories: Calendars & Scheduling, Workflow Automation, Project Management, Task Management

Sources and editorial review13 linked sources

Reviewed by Kris

Reviewed

Updated

Public documentation supports this comparison. Automation assists collection and classification; editorial standards and corrections remain the responsibility of Kris.